<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2607-9917</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Bull Dial Domic</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2607-9917</issn><publisher><publisher-name>RDPLF</publisher-name><publisher-loc>France</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25796/bdd.v9i2.87107</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>dialyse péritonéale</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Mechanical complications of peritoneal dialysis in a newly established Tunisian center: a single-center retrospective study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8453-7154</contrib-id><name><surname>Hadded</surname><given-names>Sarra</given-names></name><address><country>Tunisia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2568-9353</contrib-id><name><surname>Gaied</surname><given-names>Hanene</given-names></name><address><country>Tunisia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8744-4805</contrib-id><name><surname>Bettaieb</surname><given-names>Asma</given-names></name><address><country>Tunisia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5931-1602</contrib-id><name><surname>Khadhar</surname><given-names>Meriam</given-names></name><address><country>Tunisia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-750X</contrib-id><name><surname>Aoudia</surname><given-names>Raja</given-names></name><address><country>Tunisia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-1759</contrib-id><name><surname>Jerbi</surname><given-names>Mouna</given-names></name><address><country>Tunisia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-0774</contrib-id><name><surname>Goucha</surname><given-names>Rim</given-names></name><address><country>Tunisia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Verger</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name><address><country>France</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Service de néphrologie</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Hôpital Mongi Slim</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/013qhbw17</institution-id></institution-wrap><addr-line>Laboratoire de pathologie rénale LR00SP01, Faculté de médecine, Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunis</addr-line><country country="TN">Tunisie</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1"><institution-wrap><institution>RDPLF</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01vrww868</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="fr">France</country></aff><author-notes><fn fn-type="coi-statement"><label>Conflict of Interest</label><p>All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-6-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>6</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-6-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>6</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Home Dialysis Bulletin (BDD)</issue-title><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-3-14"><day>14</day><month>3</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2026-4-25"><day>25</day><month>4</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-5-14"><day>14</day><month>5</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Sarra hadded, Hanene Gaied, Asma Bettaieb, Meriam Khadhar , Raja Aoudia, Mouna Jerbi, Rim Goucha</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Sarra hadded, Hanene Gaied, Asma Bettaieb, Meriam Khadhar , Raja Aoudia, Mouna Jerbi, Rim Goucha</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bdd.rdplf.org/index.php/bdd/article/view/87107" xlink:title="Mechanical complications of peritoneal dialysis in a newly established Tunisian center: a single-center retrospective study">Mechanical complications of peritoneal dialysis in a newly established Tunisian center: a single-center retrospective study</self-uri><abstract><p>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an effective alternative to hemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, its success depends on proper peritoneal catheter function, and mechanical complications remain a major cause of technique failure. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 38 patients who initiated PD between October 2022 and March 2025 in a newly established Tunisian center. All catheters were implanted by mini laparotomy. Mechanical complications occurring during a minimum follow-up of three months were recorded. Fourteen patients (37%) experienced at least one mechanical complication, mainly catheter dysfunction including migration, obstruction, and drainage failure. The incidence of catheter replacement or reinsertion was 2.16 per 100 patient-months. All complications were successfully managed with conservative measures or catheter reinsertion, and no patient required permanent transfer to hemodialysis. These findings suggest that, although mechanical complications are frequent in newly established PD programs, they can be effectively managed through close monitoring and standardized protocols.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>peritoneal dialysis</kwd><kwd>mechanical complications</kwd><kwd>peritoneal catheter</kwd><kwd>technique survival</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, based on the peritoneal membrane as a semi-permeable exchange surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1"><sup>1</sup></xref>. In Tunisia, PD has been known since the early 1960s, when it was introduced as the first method of extrarenal purification, highlighting a long-standing but evolving experience with this technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2"><sup>2</sup></xref>.</p><p>Compared with hemodialysis, PD offers several advantages, including greater patient autonomy, flexibility in treatment schedules, and better preservation of residual renal function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3"><sup>3</sup></xref>. Nevertheless, its success depends on multiple factors, including patient training, prevention of infectious complications, and the proper function of the peritoneal dialysis catheter, with mechanical complications remaining a major source of morbidity, technique failure, and occasional conversion to hemodialysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4"><sup>4</sup></xref>.</p><p>Mechanical complications may also result from increased intra-abdominal pressure—leading to conditions such as hernias, hemoperitoneum, or hydrothorax—or from catheter-related issues, including dialysate leakage, migration, obstruction, or drainage failure. The incidence and types of these complications vary according to catheter insertion technique, center experience, patient characteristics, and the level of training of healthcare teams <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4"><sup>4</sup></xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5"><sup>5</sup></xref>.</p><p>The aim of this study was to describe the frequency, types, and management of mechanical complications in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis in a newly established Tunisian center, with particular emphasis on technique survival during the early phase of program implementation.</p></sec><sec><title>Material and Methods</title><sec><title>Study Design and Population</title><p>We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study including all consecutive adult patients who initiated PD between October 1, 2022, and March 31, 2025. Patients with a follow-up period of less than three months were excluded.</p></sec><sec><title>Data Collection</title><p>Demographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records, including age, sex, underlying nephropathy, body mass index, duration of peritoneal dialysis, and time between catheter insertion and initiation of dialysis. Information regarding the occurrence, type, and management of mechanical complications was also collected.</p></sec><sec><title>Catheter Insertion Technique</title><p>All double-cuff Tenckhoff catheters were implanted by an experienced digestive surgeon under general or local anesthesia using a mini-laparotomy technique. In cases requiring catheter reinsertion or repositioning, a laparoscopic approach was used to allow direct visualization of the peritoneal cavity.</p></sec><sec><title>Definition of Mechanical Complications</title><p>Mechanical complications were classified into two categories: catheter-related complications (catheter dysfunction), including migration, obstruction, drainage failure, and dialysate leakage; and other mechanical complications related to increased intra-abdominal pressure, including hernia, hemoperitoneum, and hydrothorax.</p><p>Mechanical complications were recorded regardless of their timing after catheter insertion, and both initial events and recurrences were included. Early complications were defined as those occurring within the first 30 days after catheter insertion, while late complications were defined as those occurring thereafter.</p></sec><sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed using a descriptive approach. Continuous variables were expressed as means with ranges, and categorical variables as numbers and percentages. No adjustment for confounding factors was performed, as the study was purely descriptive. Missing data were minimal and were not imputed. No comparative statistical analysis was performed between groups.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>Results</title><sec><title>Patient Characteristics</title><p>A total of 38 patients were included in the study. The mean age at initiation of peritoneal dialysis (PD) was 40.1 years (range 18–82). All patients were treated with automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), and the mean duration of PD therapy was 12.2 months.</p><p>The most frequent causes of end-stage renal disease were primary glomerulonephritis (26%) and diabetic nephropathy (23%).</p><p>During follow-up, 14 patients (37%) experienced at least one mechanical complication. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients according to the occurrence of mechanical complications are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-cq5lzz">Table I</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table-cq5lzz" ignoredToc=""><label>Tableau I.</label><caption><p>Baseline characteristics of patients according to the occurrence of mechanical complications</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><bold>Characteristic</bold></th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Patients without mechanical complication(N = 24)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Patients with mechanical complication(N = 14)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Mean age at PD initiation (years)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">38, 6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">42, 5</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><p>Gender</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Male</p></list-item><list-item><p>Female</p></list-item></list></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">16 (67%)8 (33%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11 (79%)3 (21%)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><p>Underlying nephropathy</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Primary glomerulonephritis</p></list-item><list-item><p>Diabetic nephropathy</p></list-item><list-item><p>Chronic interstitial nephropathy</p></list-item><list-item><p>ADPKD</p></list-item><list-item><p>Other causes</p></list-item></list></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">86604</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">54311</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">BMI (kg/m²)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">24, 5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">23, 9</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Delay between catheter insertion and first use (days)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">10, 4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9, 5</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Mean PD duration (months)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11, 5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13, 9</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>PD, peritoneal dialysis; ADPKD: autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; BMI, body mass index</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Mechanical Complications</title><sec><title>1. Catheter dysfunction</title><p>Catheter dysfunction occurred in 12 patients (31.5%), with a mean delay of 167.5 days after catheter insertion (range 8–740 days). Only two events occurred within the first 30 days after catheter insertion, while most complications were observed during the late period.</p><p>Catheter migration was the most frequent cause of dysfunction, followed by intraluminal obstruction and drainage failure. The main causes of catheter dysfunction are detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-370ofo">Table II</xref>.</p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-370ofo"><label>Table II.</label><caption><p>Causes of peritoneal dialysis catheter dysfunction</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"><bold>Cause of dysfunction</bold></th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"><bold>Number of cases</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Catheter migration</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Obstruction by fibrin or clot</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Omental obstruction</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Dialysate leakage</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Drainage failure due to constipation</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Total</bold></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"><bold>12</bold></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Two episodes of drainage failure were secondary to constipation and resolved after laxative treatment. Overall, 10 patients required catheter replacement or reinsertion performed laparoscopically.</p><p>The overall incidence of catheter replacement or reinsertion was 2.16 per 100 patient-months. The mean time between catheter insertion and replacement or reinsertion was 217 days (range 25–780). Two patients required a second catheter replacement after a mean delay of 92.5 days.</p></sec><sec><title>2. Other mechanical complications</title><p>Other mechanical complications were less frequent. One case of hemoperitoneum of gynecological origin was observed and resolved with conservative management. No cases of hydrothorax were reported.</p><p>An inguinal hernia occurred in one patient after eight months of peritoneal dialysis and required surgical repair.</p><p>Importantly, no patient required permanent transfer to hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis technique survival was preserved in all patients during follow-up.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title><p>The success of PD relies on the placement of a functional and long-lasting peritoneal catheter. Mechanical complications remain a major cause of catheter loss and technique failure <xref rid="BIBR-6" ref-type="bibr"><sup>6</sup></xref>. In this retrospective study conducted in a newly established Tunisian PD center, mechanical complications occurred in 37% of patients, with catheter dysfunction being the most frequent event. Despite this relatively high incidence, PD technique survival was preserved, as no patient required permanent transfer to hemodialysis.</p><p>The overall rate of mechanical complications in our cohort is consistent with previously reported data, with frequencies generally ranging between 20% and 40% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7"><sup>7</sup></xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8"><sup>8</sup></xref>. Catheter dysfunction, particularly migration and obstruction, represents the leading cause of early and late technical failure in PD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9"><sup>9</sup></xref>. In this study, the overall incidence of catheter replacement or reinsertion was 2.16 per 100 patient-months. This incidence appears comparable to previously reported data, although variations exist depending on center experience and catheter insertion techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7"><sup>7</sup></xref>. Intraluminal obstruction caused by fibrin, clots, or epiploic adhesions was less frequent, while functional obstruction due to constipation was successfully managed with conservative treatment. For this reason, routine prevention and early treatment of constipation are recommended in PD patients, as bowel distension may displace the catheter tip and impair dialysate flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3"><sup>3</sup></xref>. In our practice, preventive measures include systematic patient education, dietary advice to prevent constipation, and regular clinical monitoring of catheter function. Imaging is performed when dysfunction is suspected.</p><p>Catheter placement technique plays a critical role in preventing mechanical complications. In our center, initial catheter insertions were performed via mini-laparotomy, while laparoscopic techniques were reserved for reinsertion or repositioning, allowing direct visualization of the peritoneal cavity. This combined approach may have contributed to effective management of catheter-related complications. Published meta-analyses support laparoscopic insertion as associated with a lower risk of catheter migration and improved catheter survival at 12 and 24 months, compared with open surgery. Percutaneous insertion, often performed by nephrologists, has also shown comparable outcomes with fewer early peritonitis episodes and periprocedural complications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10"><sup>10</sup></xref>.</p><p>Other mechanical complications were less frequent in our cohort. Dialysate leakage, hernia, and hemoperitoneum were rare and successfully managed with conservative or surgical treatment when required. Hernia formation is influenced by intra-abdominal pressure, which is affected by dialysate volume, exchange frequency, patient positioning, and individual anatomical factors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11"><sup>11</sup></xref><xref rid="BIBR-12" ref-type="bibr"><sup>12</sup></xref>. This highlights the need for patient-specific preventive measures, particularly in individuals with prior abdominal surgery, weakened abdominal wall, or central obesity.</p><p>The implementation of peritoneal dialysis programs in resource-limited settings, particularly in African countries, is often challenged by limited infrastructure, variability in training, and restricted access to surgical expertise. In this context, the early phase of PD program development is considered critical, with a potentially higher risk of complications and technique failure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13"><sup>13</sup></xref>. Although data specifically focusing on mechanical complications in such settings remain scarce, several reports have highlighted the feasibility of establishing PD programs with acceptable outcomes when appropriate training, organization, and multidisciplinary collaboration are ensured <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14"><sup>14</sup></xref>.</p><p>This study has several limitations, including its retrospective design, small sample size, and relatively short follow-up period, which limit the generalizability of the results and preclude the identification of risk factors for mechanical complications. In addition, the single-center nature of the study and the absence of a comparative group further limit the external validity of our findings. Nevertheless, this work represents one of the first single-center Tunisian experiences focusing specifically on mechanical complications of PD in a newly established program.</p><p>Our findings emphasize that, even in resource-limited settings, PD can be successfully implemented with acceptable complication rates and preserved technique survival when appropriate surgical expertise, close monitoring, and multidisciplinary collaboration between nephrologists, surgeons, and PD nurses are ensured.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Mechanical complications remain an important challenge in peritoneal dialysis, particularly during the early phase of newly established programs. Ensuring meticulous catheter insertion, early recognition of complications, and structured multidisciplinary follow-up is essential to maintain catheter function and preserve technique survival. Our experience supports the feasibility of developing peritoneal dialysis programs in emerging centers when appropriate surgical expertise and standardized management strategies are implemented.</p><sec><title>ORCID iDs</title><p>Dr Hanene Gaied : <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2568-9353" xlink:title="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2568-9353">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2568-9353</ext-link></p><p>Dr Asma Bettaieb : <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8744-4805" xlink:title="https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8744-4805">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8744-4805</ext-link></p><p>Dr Mariem Khadhar : <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5931-1602" xlink:title="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5931-1602">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5931-1602</ext-link></p><p>Dr Raja Aoudia : <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-750X" xlink:title="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-750X">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-750X</ext-link></p><p>Dr Mouna Jerbi : <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-1759" xlink:title="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-1759" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-1759</ext-link></p><p>Dr Rim Goucha : <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-0774" xlink:title="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-0774">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-0774</ext-link></p><p>.</p></sec></sec></body><back><sec><title>Funding</title><p>This research received no external funding</p></sec><sec sec-type="author-contributions"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>Conceptualization: SH, HG; Data collection: SH, HG; Data analysis: SH; Manuscript drafting: SH; Manuscript revision: RG, MJ, RA, MK, AB; Final approval: All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec sec-type="ethics-statement"><title>Ethics Statement</title><p>This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Given the retrospective nature of the study and the use of anonymized data, formal ethical committee approval was not required according to institutional policy.</p></sec><sec sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data Availability</title><p>The data used are available from the author upon reasonable request.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The current state of peritoneal dialysis</article-title><source>J Am Soc Nephrol</source><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mehrotra</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Devuyst</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Davies</surname><given-names>S.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>D.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>3238</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><page-range>3238-52</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1681/ASN.2016010112</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Nephrology in Tunisia: From yesterday to now</article-title><source>Nephrol Ther</source><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>H</surname><given-names>Ben Maïz</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><fpage>173</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><page-range>173-8</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nephro.2010.03.001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis practice recommendations: Prescribing high-quality goal-directed peritoneal dialysis</article-title><source>Perit Dial Int</source><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>E.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Blake</surname><given-names>P.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boudville</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Davies</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arteaga</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>244</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><page-range>244-53</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0896860819895364</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Complications of peritoneal dialysis part I</article-title><source>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</source><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>X.B.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bargman</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>784</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><page-range>784-90</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2215/CJN.0000000000000417</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Complications and catheter survival with prolonged embedding of peritoneal dialysis catheters</article-title><source>Nephrol Dial Transplant</source><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>P.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>McCormick</surname><given-names>B.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Knoll</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Doucette</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fergusson</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2008</year><fpage>2299</fpage><lpage>303</lpage><page-range>2299-303</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ndt/gfn003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Technique failure in peritoneal dialysis: Modifiable causes and patient-specific risk factors</article-title><source>Perit Dial Int</source><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bonenkamp</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sluijs</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dekker</surname><given-names>F.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Struijk</surname><given-names>D.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fijter</surname><given-names>C.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vermeeren</surname><given-names>Y.M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><page-range>73-83</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/08968608221077461</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>A multi-institutional observational study of outcomes after catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis in Japan</article-title><source>Perit Dial Int</source><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sakurada</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kojima</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamada</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Koitabashi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Taki</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsui</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>457</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><page-range>457-66</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/08968608231193240</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Creating and maintaining optimal peritoneal dialysis access in the adult patient: 2019 update</article-title><source>Perit Dial Int</source><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crabtree</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shrestha</surname><given-names>B.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chow</surname><given-names>K.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Figueiredo</surname><given-names>A.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Povlsen</surname><given-names>J.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilkie</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>414</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><page-range>414-36</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3747/pdi.2018.00232</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Updates on infectious and other complications in peritoneal dialysis: Core curriculum 2023</article-title><source>Am J Kidney Dis</source><volume>82</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>S.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>481</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><page-range>481-90</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.03.011</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Percutaneous versus surgical catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</article-title><source>ANZ J Surg</source><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chui</surname><given-names>J.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>T.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaman</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hameed</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyld</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>664</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><page-range>664-74</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ans.19315</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Relationship between intraperitoneal pressure and the development of hernias in peritoneal dialysis: Confirmation for the first time of a widely accepted concept</article-title><source>Int Urol Nephrol</source><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Betancourt</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pico</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rojas</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gordo</surname><given-names>M.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliva</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Almirall</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>759</fpage><lpage>65</lpage><page-range>759-65</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11255-023-03663-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>How to manage abdominal hernia on peritoneal dialysis?</article-title><source>Nephrol Ther</source><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boyer</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonnamy</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lanot</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guillouet</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Béchade</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Recorbet</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>164</fpage><lpage>70</lpage><page-range>164-70</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nephro.2019.07.331</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Peritoneal dialysis in Africa</article-title><source>Perit Dial Int</source><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abu-Aisha</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elamin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><page-range>23-8</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3747/pdi.2008.00226</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Peritoneal dialysis in the developing world: Recommendations from a symposium at the ISPD meeting 2008</article-title><source>Perit Dial Int</source><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Finkelstein</surname><given-names>F.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abu-Aisha</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Najafi</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lo</surname><given-names>W.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abraham</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pecoits-Filho</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><year>2009</year><fpage>618</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><page-range>618-22</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/089686080902900605</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>