Analysis of ultrafiltration volume during long dwell with icodextrin in automated peritoneal dialysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v8i1.86303Keywords:
Peritoneal Dialysis, Automated Peritoneal Dialysis, Chronic Kidney Disease, Icodextrin, Intra-Peritoneal Pressure, UltrafiltrationAbstract
Icodextrin's unique osmotic properties enable effective fluid volume management in the peritoneal cavity by limiting reabsorption. However, its efficacy fluctuates during prolonged dwell periods in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), posing challenges and increasing the risk of treatment failure. This study examines negative ultrafiltration (UF) during daytime dwell in APD patients using icodextrin and aims to identify associated factors. A retrospective observational monocentric study on UF during prolonged icodextrin dwell periods in APD was conducted among 27 incident patients at the University Hospital of Caen in Normandy, France. The primary focus was the presence of negative daytime UF, with intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) as the main exposure variable. Statistical analyses, including group comparisons and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions, explored associations between negative daytime UF, IPP, and other relevant variables. While no variable showed a significant correlation, IPP (OR=1.06), Volume of the last injection (OR=0.97), and Body Mass Index (OR=0.97) exhibited interesting trends. The multivariate analysis showed no significant association between the variables and negative daytime UF. Nevertheless, IPP was the only variable that improved the model's quality, suggesting a potential link for further exploration. This study raises important questions for future research and clinical practice regarding the systematic measure of the IPP during peritoneal dialysis treatments, despite its limitations, including a small sample size and the retrospective observational nature of the methodology, affecting the statistical power and the ability to establish causal links.
References
1. Thierry Vignolles. Les Chiffres Clés de La Maladie Rénale. https://www.francerein.org/actualites/les-chiffres-cles-de-la-maladie-renale/ (2022).
2. Mehrotra, R., Devuyst, O., Davies, S. J., & Johnson, D. W. (2016). The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 27(11), 3238–3252. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2016010112
3. Lanot, A, Lobbedez, T. Place et utilisation de la dialyse péritonéale dans le traitement de l’insuffisance rénale chronique terminale. Nephrologie 34, 1–18 (2022).
4. Boyer, A., Lanot, A., Béchade, C., & Lobbedez, T. (2022). La dialyse péritonéale : ce que le réanimateur doit savoir. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 32(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.37051/mir-00134
5. Auguste, B. L., & Bargman, J. M. (2023). Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription and Adequacy in Clinical Practice: Core Curriculum 2023. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 81(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.07.004
6. Blake P. G. (2008). Peritoneal dialysis: a «kinder,gentler» treatment for the elderly?. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 28(5), 435–436.
7. Jin, H., Fang, W., Wang, L., Zang, X., Deng, Y., Wu, G., Li, Y., Chen, X., Wang, N., Jiang, G., Guo, Z., Wang, X., Qi, Y., Lv, S., & Ni, Z. (2024). A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Automated Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis for Urgent-Start Dialysis in ESRD. Kidney international reports, 9(9), 2627–2634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.06.032
8. Lambie, M., Stompor, T., & Davies, S. (2009). Understanding the variability in ultrafiltration obtained with icodextrin. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 29(4), 407–411.
9. Mujais, S. et al. Evaluation and management of ultrafiltration problems in peritoneal dialysis. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Ad Hoc Committee on Ultrafiltration Management in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int 20 Suppl 4, S5-21 (2000).
10. Venturoli, D., Jeloka, T. K., Ersoy, F. F., Rippe, B., & Oreopoulos, D. G. (2009). The variability in ultrafiltration achieved with icodextrin, possibly explained. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 29(4), 415–421.
11. Silver, S. A., Harel, Z., & Perl, J. (2014). Practical considerations when prescribing icodextrin: a narrative review. American journal of nephrology, 39(6), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363417
12. Frampton J. E., Plosker G. L. & Bredie S. J. H. Icodextrin: a review of its use in peritoneal dialysis. Adis Drug Evaluation 63, 2079–2105 (2003).
13. Ahmad, M., Jeloka, T., Pliakogiannis, T., Tapiawala, S., Zhong, H., Bargman, J. M., & Oreopoulos, D. (2008). Icodextrin produces higher ultrafiltration in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients on continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis. International urology and nephrology, 40(1), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-007-9298-3
14. Paniagua, R., Ventura, M. D., Avila-Díaz, M., Cisneros, A., Vicenté-Martínez, M., Furlong, M. D., García-González, Z., Villanueva, D., Orihuela, O., Prado-Uribe, M. D., Alcántara, G., & Amato, D. (2009). Icodextrin improves metabolic and fluid management in high and high-average transport diabetic patients. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 29(4), 422–432.
15. Jeloka, T. K., Ersoy, F. F., Yavuz, M., Sahu, K. M., Camsari, T., Utaş, C., Bozfakioglu, S., Ozener, C., Ateş, K., Ataman, R., Akçiçek, F., Akpolat, T., Karayaylali, I., Arinsoy, T., Mehmet, E. Y., Süleymanlar, G., Burdzy, D., & Oreopoulos, D. G. (2006). What is the optimal dwell time for maximizing ultrafiltration with icodextrin exchange in automated peritoneal dialysis patients?. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 26(3), 336–340.
16. Qi, H., Xu, C., Yan, H., & Ma, J. (2011). Comparison of icodextrin and glucose solutions for long dwell exchange in peritoneal dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 31(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2009.00264.
17. Morelle, J., Stachowska-Pietka, J., Öberg, C., Gadola, L., La Milia, V., Yu, Z., Lambie, M., Mehrotra, R., de Arteaga, J., & Davies, S. (2021). ISPD recommendations for the evaluation of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in adults: Classification, measurement, interpretation and rationale for intervention. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 41(4), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860820982218
18. Imholz, A. L., Koomen, G. C., Struijk, D. G., Arisz, L., & Krediet, R. T. (1993). Effect of an increased intraperitoneal pressure on fluid and solute transport during CAPD. Kidney international, 44(5), 1078–1085. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1993.351.
19. Krediet, R., & Mujais, S. (2002). Use of icodextrin in high transport ultrafiltration failure. Kidney international. Supplement, (81), S53–S61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.62.s81.8.x
20.Castellanos, L. B., Clemente, E. P., Cabañas, C. B., Parra, D. M., Contador, M. B., Morera, J. C. O., & Daly, J. A. (2017). Clinical Relevance of Intraperitoneal Pressure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 37(5), 562–567. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2016.00267
21.Dejardin, A., Robert, A., & Goffin, E. (2007). Intraperitoneal pressure in PD patients: relationship to intraperitoneal volume, body size and PD-related complications. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 22(5), 1437–1444. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl745 22. Durand P. Y., Chanliau J., Gamberoni J., Hestin D. & Kessler, M. Routine measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure. Adv Perit Dial 8, 108–12 (1992).
23. Sobrino-Pérez, A., Pérez-Escudero, A., Fernández-Arroyo, L., Dorado-García, A., Martín-Alcón, B., Gutiérrez-Martín, C., Sánchez-Fonseca, C., Barrios-Rebollo, C., Pérez-Díaz, V., & Group PIPDPCyL (2021). Intraperitoneal pressure: Stability over time and validation of Durand’s measurement method. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 41(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860820973120
24. Durand, P. Y., Chanliau, J., Gambéroni, J., Hestin, D., & Kessler, M. (1996). Measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure: a necessary routine test in peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, 16 Suppl 1, S84–S87.
25. Pérez Díaz, V., Sanz Ballesteros, S., Hernández García, E., Descalzo Casado, E., Herguedas Callejo, I., & Ferrer Perales, C. (2017). Intraperitoneal pressure in peritoneal dialysis. La presión intraperitoneal en diálisis peritoneal. Nefrologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia, 37(6), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2017.05.014
26. Ferreira A. C. (2023). Intraperitoneal pressure in peritoneal dialysis patients: a need for treatment individualization. Clinical kidney journal, 16(9), 1367–1368. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad140
Full Text:
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tara Srouji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
