Cost of Home Dialysis in France
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v5i3.67593Keywords:
Home dialysis, peritoneal dialysis, Daily home hemodialysis, cost, Medico-economicsAbstract
Summary
Medico-economic evaluation is defined as economic evaluation applied to the health field. It is a comparative analysis of different diagnostic, therapeutic or preventive strategies, based on their costs and health outcomes. We have only one medico-economic study on the costs of dialysis in France, carried out by the Haute Autorité de Santé, which covered the year 2012 and consisted of cross-referencing 3 databases: the Registre Réseau Épidémiologique et Information en Néphrologie and the Système National d’Informations Inter-régimes de l’Assurance Maladie et de l’Hospitalisation. Analyses focused on prevalent patients, incident patients and key patient characteristics: age, presence of diabetes and care trajectories. The average monthly cost varied considerably according to the management modality, from 3774 euros/month in autonomous continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) to 7253 euros/month in center-based hemodialysis. The monthly cost of therapies according to the patient profile appears to be strongly affected by the diabetic status of the patients. This analysis shows the high cost of transport for patients on in-center hemodialysis (20% of total expenditures), and even higher for nursing care in assisted CAPD (37% of total expenditures). The total tariff decreases from 2014 to 2020 were -17.6% for center-based hemodialysis and -9.8% for the low medicalized dialysis unit (LMDU), while the total 2014–2021 tariff increases were +9.3% for CAPD and +9.1% for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). Paradoxically, these price changes have increased the cost of assisted peritoneal dialysis, which is now almost at the same level of overall cost as in-center hemodialysis for the French health insurance system. The ongoing study of the Physidia Laboratory’s retrospective cohort on daily home hemodialysis (DHH) should allow us to know the current cost of each hemodialysis technique currently practiced in France, including DHH.
1 - INTRODUCTION
Healthcare expenses reimbursed by the French health national insurance system called Assurance Maladie in France amounted to 167 billion euros in 2019 for all schemes; expenditures for the management of end-stage chronic renal failure amounted to 4.1 billion, or 2.45% of all expenditures for 98,427 patientsFigure 1;[1].
Figure 1.Distribution of health insurance expenses reimbursed in 2019 by category of pathologies, chronic treatments and episodes of care: 167 billion euros for all schemes
The annual expenditure per patient for end-stage chronic renal failure is the highest, regardless of the pathology, chronic treatment or episode of care, and amounts to an average of 41,701 euros/year/patient (Table I);[1].
| Pathology, treatment or health event | Numbers | Total average cost | including outpatient care | including hospitalizations | including cash services |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardio-neurovascular diseases | 5 129 236 | 3 448 € | 1 542 € | 1 740 € | 215 € |
| Including acute cardio-neurovascular diseases | 454 615 | 9 142 € | 1 481 € | 7 967 € | 237 € |
| Including chronic cardio-neurovascular diseases | 4 982 836 | 2 716 € | 1 452 € | 1 064 € | 200 € |
| Treatment of vascular risk (independently of pathology) | 8 476 179 | 661 € | 508 € | 47 € | 106 € |
| Diabetes | 3 964 561 | 2 164 € | 1 810 € | 211 € | 143 € |
| Cancers | 3 297 155 | 6 097 € | 2 502 € | 3 243 € | 352 € |
| Including active cancers | 1 467 392 | 12 270 € | 4 661 € | 7 091 € | 518 € |
| Including cancers under medical supervision | 1 930 730 | 1 086 € | 730 € | 149 € | 207 € |
| Psychiatric deseases or psychotropic drugs | 8 103 919 | 2 804 € | 799 € | 1 359 € | 646 € |
| Including Psychiatric diseases | 2 508 405 | 6 413 € | 1 252 € | 4 179 € | 982 € |
| Including Psychotropic drugs | 5 595 514 | 1 187 € | 597 € | 95 € | 495 € |
| Neurological or degenerative diseases | 1 673 904 | 4 576 € | 2 879 € | 1 341 € | 355 € |
| Chronic respiratory diseases (excluding cystic fibrosis) | 3 656 804 | 954 € | 589 € | 267 € | 98 € |
| Inflammatory diseases, or rare diseases or HIV or AIDS | 1 286 272 | 4 744 € | 3 292 € | 1 025 € | 427 € |
| End-stage kidney disease | 98 427 | 41 701 € | 12 692 € | 28 194 € | 815 € |
| Including chronic dialysis | 54 566 | 60 557 € | 16 965 € | 43 097 € | 496 € |
| Including kidney transplantation | 3 514 | 68 127 € | 15 590 € | 50 333 € | 2 204 € |
| Including follow up of kidney transplantatioon | 40 347 | 13 897 € | 6 660 € | 6 111 € | 1 126 € |
| Diseases of the liver or pancreas (excluding cystic fibrosis) | 604 162 | 2 545 € | 1 391 € | 913 € | 241 € |
| Other long-term diseases | 1 975 489 | 2 177 € | 1 627 € | 364 € | 186 € |
| Pregnancy (with or without pathologies) | 1 265 621 | 6 698 € | 979 € | 2 856 € | 2 863 € |
| Occasional hospitalizations (with or without pathologies, treatments or maternity) | 9 417 185 | 3 972 € | 553 € | 3 054 € | 365 € |
| Analgesic or anti-inflammatory treatment (excluding pathologies, treatments, maternity or hospitalizations) | 1 308 126 | 1 159 € | 608 € | 89 € | 462 € |
| No pathology, treatment, maternity, hospitalization, or analgesic or anti-inflammatory treatment | 36 194 044 | 308 € | 196 € | 32 € | 79 € |
Given the importance of such financial volumes, medico-economic analysis is of paramount importance. Medico-economic evaluation is defined as the economic evaluation applied to the field of health; it is a comparative analysis of the different diagnostic, therapeutic or preventive strategies on the basis of their costs and their health outcomes[2]. The use of medico-economic analysis has been imposed for 30 years by various French and European health agencies: the High Authority for Health (Haute autorité de Santé (HAS) and the National Health Security Agency of Food, Environment and Labor (Agence Nationale de sécurité Sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail (ANSES)) in France, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England, and the Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitwesen (IQWiG) in Germany[2].
2 - HAS METHODOLOGY
The analytical methodology initially included the drafting of a framework note defining the feasibility and scope of the project, validated by the Commission for Economic and Public Health Assessment (Commission d’Évaluation Économique et de Santé Publique (CEESP)) of HAS on July 6, 2010 and secondarily validated by the College of HAS on November 3, 2010. A multidisciplinary and multiprofessional working group comprising health economists, methodologists, nephrologists (all types of practice), caregivers, administrators and representatives of associations of patients with renal insufficiency was then formed[3]. This working group met from February 2011 to June 2014, for a total of 7 working meetings[3]. The report drawn up by the working group was submitted to a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional review group[3]. The final report was approved by the Commission for Economic and Public Health Assessment (Commission d’Évaluation Économique et de Santé Publique (CEESP)) and then validated by the HAS board[3].
3 - MAIN RESULTS OF HAS WORK
3-1. What were the conclusions of the HAS concerning the data from the literature on medico-economic studies
References
2. Beresniak A, Duru G. Économie de la santé. Elsevier-Masson, Paris 08/2020 ; ISBN : 9782294769214
3. HAS - Agence de la Biomédecine. Rapport d’évaluation médico-économique. Évaluation médico-économique des stratégies de prise en charge de l’insuffisance rénale chronique terminale en France. Octobre 2014. https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_1775180/fr/evaluation-medico-economique-des-strategies-de-prise-en-charge-de-l-insuffisance-renale-chronique-terminale-en-france.
Argumentaire : https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-11/argumentaire_irct_vf_2014-11-06_19-21-13_876.pdf
Annexe : https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-11/annexes_irct_vf.pdf. Fiche de synthèse : https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-11/fiche_de_sytnhese_vf.pdf.
Synthèse et conclusions : https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-11/synthese_irct_vf.pdf
4. Zambrowski JJ. Coût de la dialyse. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique. 2016;12S: S95-S97. doi : 10.1016/j.nephro.2016.02.002
5. Bechu T. Note interne de la Fédération des Cliniques et Hôpitaux Privés branche Médecine, Chirurgie et Obstétrique (FHP MCO) sur l’évolution des financements de la dialyse durant les années 2014-2021
6. Thomas M, Directeur Médical Physidia. Communication personnelle 2021
7. Walker RC, Howard K, Morton RL. Home hemodialysis: a comprehensive review of patient-centered and economic considerations. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017;9:149-161. doi : 10.2147/CEOR.S69340
8. Rostoker G, Issad B, Fessi H, Massy ZA. Why and how should we promote home dialysis for patients with end-stage kidney disease during and after the coronavirus 2019 disease pandemic? A French perspective. J Nephrol. 2021;34(4):985-989. doi: 10.1007/s40620-021-01061-7.
9. Baerman EA, Kaplan J, Shen JI, Winkelmayer WC, Erickson KF. Cost Barriers to more widespread use of peritoneal dialysis in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022;33(6):1063-1072, doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021060854
10. Rostoker G, Issad B. Financial barriers to optimal use of peritoneal dialysis in France and Europe as in United States of America. J Am Soc Nephrol, under Submission
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Guy Rostoker

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






