Predictive factors for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Survival: a ten-year single center study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v7i4.85243Keywords:
peritoneal dialysis, survival, mechanical complicatioAbstract
Introduction and Objectives: Timely insertion and adequate management of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) related complications are crucial for the success of Peritoneal Dialysis. The aim of this study was to review the peritoneal dialysis catheter outcomes at our center, identifying factors that influence catheter survival.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 146 PD patients who received their first PDC between August/ 2012 and July/2022. The mean follow-up was 26.5 ± 22.7 months.
Results: Mean age was 55.1 ± 16.6 years, and 58.2% were male. Peritonitis occurred in 75 patients (51.4%), with 26 (34.7%) requiring catheter removal. Mechanical complications were observed in 66 patients (45.2%), with 16 requiring catheter removal. Catheter survival at 12, 24, and 36 months was 80.2%, 72.4%, and 61.6%, respectively. Non-infectious complications (p=0.006) and peritonitis episodes (p=0.017) were associated with higher rate of PDC-associated removal. In the multivariate analysis, non-infectious complications were the only independent variable significantly associated with catheter survival (Hazard ratio 2.53; 95% CI 1.383–4.624). No association was found between PDC survival and age, diabetic status, obesity, prior kidney transplant, previous abdominal surgery, or method of catheter insertion.
Conclusions: Despite the significant number of infectious complications, including peritonitis, these did not result in a substantial decrease in catheter survival in the multivariate analysis. These findings emphasize the importance of effectively managing non-infectious complications to ensure successful and long-term use of PDCs. Preventive measures, such as omentectomy simultaneously with PDC implantation, may be considered on a case-by-case basis.
References
Chaudhary K. Peritoneal Dialysis Drop-out: Causes and Prevention Strategies. Int J Nephrol. 2011;2011:434608. doi:10.4061/2011/434608
Dong X, Wu H, Ye H, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors Associated with Technique Failure in the First Year of Peritoneal Dialysis: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Southern China. BMC Nephrol. Jun 11 2022;23(1):207. doi:10.1186/s12882-022-02833-4
Martínez-Mier G, Luna-Castillo M, Ortiz-Enríquez JJ, et al. Factors associated with early peritoneal dialysis catheter replacement in Veracruz, Mexico. Nefrologia. May 14 2012;32(3):353-8. doi:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2012.Jan.11295
Chow KM, Li PK, Cho Y, et al. ISPD Catheter-related Infection Recommendations: 2023 Update. Perit Dial Int. May 2023;43(3):201-219. doi:10.1177/08968608231172740
Nodaira Y, Ikeda N, Kobayashi K, et al. Risk factors and cause of removal of peritoneal dialysis catheter in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial. 2008;24:65-8.
Singh N, Davidson I, Minhajuddin A, Gieser S, Nurenberg M, Saxena R. Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter survival: a 9-year single-center study in 315 patients. J Vasc Access. 2010;11(4):316-22. doi:10.5301/jva.2010.5774
Cheng XBJ, Bargman J. Complications of Peritoneal Dialysis Part I: Mechanical Complications. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. Jun 01 2024;19(6):784-790. doi:10.2215/CJN.0000000000000417
McCormick BB, Bargman JM. Noninfectious complications of peritoneal dialysis: implications for patient and technique survival. J Am Soc Nephrol. Dec 2007;18(12):3023-5. doi:10.1681/ASN.2007070796
Gadallah MF, Pervez A, el-Shahawy MA, et al. Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomized study on outcome. Am J Kidney Dis. Jan 1999;33(1):118-22. doi:10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70266-0
Apostolidis NS, Panoussopoulos DG, Manouras AJ, Pararas BN, Voudiklari SG, Zirogiannis PN. The use of TWH catheters in CAPD patients: fourteen-year experience in technique, survival, and complication rates. Perit Dial Int. 1998;18(4):424-8.
Kang SH, Park JW, Cho KH, Do JY. Comparison of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion techniques by nephrologists: Surgical vs blind methods. Semin Dial. Jan 2021;34(1):31-37. doi:10.1111/sdi.12904
Goh YH. Omental folding: a novel laparoscopic technique for salvaging peritoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Int. 2008;28(6):626-31.
Yang CY, Chen TW, Lin YP, et al. Determinants of catheter loss following continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis. Perit Dial Int. 2008;28(4):361-70.
Tiong HY, Poh J, Sunderaraj K, Wu YJ, Consigliere DT. Surgical complications of Tenckhoff catheters used in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Singapore Med J. Aug 2006;47(8):707-11.
Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ. Effect of prior abdominal surgery, peritonitis, and adhesions on catheter function and long-term outcome on peritoneal dialysis. Am Surg. Feb 2009;75(2):140-7. doi:10.1177/000313480907500206
Eroglu E, Heimbürger O, Lindholm B. Peritoneal dialysis patient selection from a comorbidity perspective. Semin Dial. Jan 2022;35(1):25-39. doi:10.1111/sdi.12927
Krezalek MA, Bonamici N, Kuchta K, et al. Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used. Surg Endosc. Apr 2018;32(4):1714-1723. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5852-y
Chen Y, Shao Y, Xu J. The Survival and Complication Rates of Laparoscopic Versus Open Catheter Placement in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. Oct 2015;25(5):440-3. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000188
Boujelbane L, Fu N, Chapla K, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical insertion of PD catheters in dialysis patients: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2015;16(6):498-505. doi:10.5301/jva.5000439
Tullavardhana T, Akranurakkul P, Ungkitphaiboon W, Songtish D. Surgical versus percutaneous techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: A meta-analysis of the outcomes. Ann Med Surg (Lond). Sep 2016;10:11-8. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.007
Crabtree JH, Shrestha BM, Chow KM, et al. Creating and Maintaining Optimal Peritoneal Dialysis Access in the Adult Patient: 2019 Update. Perit Dial Int. 2019;39(5):414-436. doi:10.3747/pdi.2018.00232
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bárbara Beirão Rodrigues, Mariana Freitas, João S. Borges, Beatriz Pereira , Catarina Prata, Rui Castro , Teresa Morgado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.